TypeScript: Why You Should Say No to 'any'

If you are a developer who writes code in TypeScript, you probably have come across the “any” type. You often use “any” type when working with dynamic values or those whose types are unknown. It helps you bypass the strict rules TypeScript imposes on variable types. However, this approach carries certain risks. Evading TypeScript’s safety checks results in errors and bugs in your code. 

This blog post will showcase why you mustn’t use “any” type to write code. It will also reveal how to use TypeScript’s built-in features to write impeccable codes. Let’s dive into it.

What is the 'any' type in TypeScript?

The any type in TypeScript is a special type that can hold values of any kind. For example, a variable of type any can store a number, a string, an object, or a function. TypeScript will not apply standard rules to such a variable. It lets you perform any operation on it. Also, TypeScript won’t point out any errors, if you add a number and a string or call a method on an object that doesn’t exist. You can read the official TypeScript documentation for more details. 

Often seen as a workaround for strict typing, the “any” type is capable of introducing uncertainty into your codebase. Whilst enabling flexibility, it can surpass TypeScript’s type-checking capabilities, thereby increasing the difficulty level of debugging. This means that even if you allocate a function to a variable by mistake and according to that command if it is expected to hold a string, TypeScript will not send any warning sign. Hence, we can observe that overuse of “any” can make your code behave in an unpredictable manner, particularly in large projects where it is extremely critical to maintain consistency.

Why would you use the 'any' type?

There are instances where the use of “any” type is suitable. For example, when dealing with external libraries or APIs that may not have type definitions. In this case, “any” type helps you compile code without fussing about the type information.  

Alternatively, when you move a project from JavaScript to TypeScript, you may not be prepared to assign types to everything promptly. In this case, you can evade the standard TypeScript checks and make your code functional by employing “any” type. However, these actions carry a trade-off. TypeScript, with its safety checks, helps detect errors in the early stages of code development. It also helps write highly readable codes. Without TypeScript standard checks, your code will likely contain errors and lack clarity.

Even though the “any” type can turn out to be useful in few scenarios, for instance while working with untyped third-party libraries, it should be used occasionally in an informed way. It can provide assistance as a short-term solution while making the transition from JavaScript to TypeScript, but depending on it a lot causes reduction in the benefits of static typing. As an alternative, you can explore TypeScript’s features like unknown, never, or generics, which offer quite similar flexibility while completely maintaining type safety. Additionally, TypeScript’s utility types, such as Partial<T> or Record<K, T>, enable handling of dynamic data structures without sacrificing type integrity.

The 'any' Type: A Double-Edged Sword

Using 'any' in TypeScript can be likened to telling the compiler, "I've got this—trust me!" But, this is a gamble that can backfire and cause many bugs and issues in your code. By opting for 'any,' you essentially forget the benefits of TypeScript's early error detection, transforming your code into what is essentially JavaScript, devoid of static typing advantages.

The Downsides of Overusing 'any'

Embracing the 'any' type liberally might seem convenient, but it comes at a cost. Here's why it's considered bad practice:

Lost Type Safety: TypeScript shines in catching type-related errors early in development. 'any' diminishes this advantage, leaving your code susceptible to bugs that might slip through unnoticed.

1// Function with `any` type
2function processData(data: any[]): any[] {
3	// Here, we can get a runtime error when the item has no
4	// property named value, it is a possibility since we have
5	// `data` with `any` type
6  return data.map(item => ({ processedValue: processString(item.value) }));
7}
8
9// Function without `any` type
10interface Item {
11  value: string;
12}
13
14function processData(data: Item[]): { processedValue: string }[] {
15  // No chance of running into runtime error as we have assigned
16	// definitive types to parameters now compiler knows that item 
17	// will definitely have property value
18	return data.map(item => ({ processedValue: processString(item.value) }));
19}

Reading Challenges: Overreliance on 'any' can make code less readable. Instead of clear and specific types, your code becomes a puzzle developers must decipher, hindering collaboration and maintenance.

1// Function using any type
2function concatenate(x: any, y: any): any {
3	// This function could potentially be used to add any type
4	// of variable which might lead to runtime errors, developer
5	// new to the codebase might not know what this function does
6  return x + y;
7}
8
9// Function without using any type
10function concatenate(x: string, x: string): string {
11	// This function definition itself documents it and provides
12	// better readability
13  return x + y;
14}

Strategies to Break Free from 'any'

Now that we understand the perils, let's explore practical strategies to liberate our code from the clutches of 'any.'

Embrace Specific Types: Instead of resorting to the generic 'any,' opt for more specific types like number, string, boolean, or custom types such as classes and interfaces. This not only enhances clarity but also fortifies your code.

1let num: any;
2num = 10.123; 
3console.log(num.toFixed()); 
4num.willExist(); // won't show any error as num has `any` type

1let num: number;
2num = 10.123; 
3console.log(num.toFixed()); 
4num.willExist(); // will show an error now

Leverage Type Inference: Let TypeScript work its magic by allowing type inference. Often, TypeScript can deduce types from assigned values, reducing the need for explicit type declarations.

1let result = 3; // result implicitly has number type
2result = "three" // This will throw an error.

Harness Unions and Intersections: Employ type unions (using |) and intersections (using &) to create complex types. This lets you express broader possibilities without resorting to the catch-all 'any.'

1// Union Example
2
3// `myVariable` will have either a string or null value,
4//  we cannot assign anything else
5let myVariable: string | null;
6
7// Intersection Example
8type Person = {
9  name: string;
10  age: number;
11};
12
13type Worker = {
14  jobTitle: string;
15  salary: number;
16};
17
18type Employee = Person & Worker;

Embrace 'unknown': When uncertain about a variable's type, consider using 'unknown.' It provides flexibility like 'any,' but with the caveat that you must ascertain the type before usage, offering a safety net against runtime errors.

1// any type
2let x: any = 'any type variable';
3console.log('Value of x : ' + x);
4
5let y: string =  x;
6console.log('Value of y : ' + y);

1// unknown type
2let x: unknown = 'unknown type variable';
3console.log('Value of x : ' + x);
4
5let y: string =  x;
6console.log('Value of y : ' + y);

Define Object Types: If primitive types don't suffice, define object types using interfaces, types, or generics. This provides a clear roadmap for TypeScript, enhancing its understanding of acceptable values.

1// Using 'type' to define a type
2type PersonType = {
3  name: string;
4  age: number;
5  greet: (greeting: string) => void;
6};
7
8// Using 'interface' to define a type
9interface PersonInterface {
10  name: string;
11  age: number;
12  greet: (greeting: string) => void;
13}

How ‘any’ Affects Performance & Code Maintainability

Usage of the ‘any’ type has many benefits as it offers a quick solution for managing dynamic values. However, it does come with its set of unique challenges as it introduces hidden performance and poses difficulty in maintainability, especially in larger codebases.

Increased Debugging Effort

TypeScript’s static type checking helps in catching errors at compile time. This comprises its main function. When ‘any’ is overused, it goes past this safety mechanism without any alarm or warning being raised; thus leading to undetected issues that surface only at runtime. This leads to developers spending additional time debugging and fixing errors that TypeScript could have  flagged earlier for ease and convenience.

Poor Code Readability and Collaboration

A well-typed codebase provides the much needed navigation for developers. It serves as self-documentation which simplifies the process of understanding data flow through the application for developers. When variables and functions use ‘any,’ new developers as well as the original authors after a while may face difficulties to decipher what is the expected data, thus leading to confusion and long hours.

Loss of IntelliSense and Autocompletion

Modern IDEs offer intelligent code suggestions, type hints, and error detection based on TypeScript's type system. But by making use of ‘any,’ developers lose these benefits. This makes it pretty difficult not just to navigate but also to use APIs efficiently. This can slow down the process of development for obvious reasons, especially for complex projects.

Potential Performance Overhead

Since TypeScript compiles to JavaScript it does not affect runtime performance. However, improper type usage can lead to performance issues. For instance:

• Using ‘any’ allows unplanned and unintended type conversions which in turn leads to ineffective code execution which might also come across as amateurish.
• To make up and reimburse for missing compile-time checks lead to unnecessary type checks and manual validation in runtime code which also adds overhead.

Difficult Refactoring and Scalability Issues

When ‘any’ is used in an all-inclusive way, making changes to the codebase becomes all the more risky. Without strict types, any newly introduced refactoring requires manual audit to make sure that nothing breaks. This adds to the difficulty level of scaling the application. On the flip side, a well-typed codebase allows automated refactoring with complete reliability.

Common Misconceptions About ‘any’

“Using ‘any’ makes development faster”

• Even though ‘any’ enables swift development initially, it leads to more debugging and maintenance in the long run. Strict typing is helpful in preventing hidden errors.

“If I don’t know the type, ‘any’ is the only solution”

• Instead of ‘any,’ there are many other safer alternatives like unknown, generics, or union types (string | number) that are able to maintain flexibility whilst also ensuring type safety.

“TypeScript is too strict; I need ‘any’ to work with dynamic data”

• TypeScript provides tools like type inference, optional properties, and type guards to manage dynamic data without sacrificing type safety.

“Converting an existing JavaScript project to TypeScript requires using ‘any’ everywhere”

• You can slowly adopt TypeScript in moderation by defining types for critical components and using unknown or Partial<T> instead of ‘any’ when necessary.

“If TypeScript compiles successfully, my code is bug-free”

• While TypeScript is able to detect many issues early, logical errors can still exist. Precise types and detailed testing remain important for reliability and consistency.

Conclusion

The risks associated with the utilization of the "any" type in TypeScript have been detailed with clarity in this blog post. The errors and bugs that arise due to the use of the 'any' type can go undetected by TypeScript.

However, there's a feasible alternative. Robustly framed coding can be done by using TypeScript's built-in features and tools. These include using specific types, leveraging type inference, harnessing unions and intersections, embracing 'unknown', and defining object types. This way, you can create powerful and expressive code that comes under the safety net of TypeScript.

Our intent with this blog was to help introduce something new and useful. TypeScript is a powerful and innovative language that helps you write better code. If you undertake a correct and disciplined approach, you can leverage it to your best advantage.
Do you want to create effective web and mobile apps? With Aubergine Solutions, you have to look no further since we have got you covered. We have expertise in TypeScript and many other web and mobile technologies. Our team consists of expert software developers who not only assist you with your project but cater to all your project needs, right from the beginning phase of design to development. We can help you design and develop diverse kinds of websites, including simple, basic framework-based websites, to an intricate web app, or a cross-platform mobile app. Contact us today.